The Publication Trends of Orthopaedic Surgery Residents Accepted into Spine Fellowship Programs

Publication Trends of Spine Fellows

Authors

  • Franklin J. Powlan, M.D. TTUHSC https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8417-8065
  • Benjamin R. Childs, M.D.
  • Madison Craft, M.D.
  • Austin B. Fares, M.D.
  • Daniel G. Kang, M.D.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v4i2.55

Keywords:

spine, research, fellowship, residency

Abstract

Background: Many orthopaedic surgery residents continue to publish research articles despite no requirements for most spine fellowships. We hypothesize that the number of publications published by orthopaedic surgery residents accepted into spine fellowship are increasing.

Objective: To determine research trends of orthopaedic surgery residents who go onto spine fellowship after residency.

Methods:  A list of spine fellows who matched into fellowship between 2013 to 2019 was compiled from publicly accessible information on spine fellowship websites. Data collected included specific year of fellowship, fellowship program, region of fellowship, number of articles published, high impact journals, and first authorship publications and statistically analyzed with Microsoft Excel.

Results: A total of 306 spine fellows who matched between 2013 to 2019 were identified with 1522 publications during residency, 404 (26.5%) publications in high impact journals, and 541 (35.5%) first author publications. Average publications per fellow increased from 1.1 in 2013 to 6.6 in 2019 with an R2 of .90 on linear regression analysis. The highest average publications came from the Midwest and South region. The highest average of publications in high impact journals, and first authorships came from the Midwest region.

Conclusion: The average number of publications, first authorships, and publications in high impact journals has increased over recent years. These trends are important for residents considering applying to spine fellowship in order to give themselves a competitive advantage, target regions that best suit them, and provide themselves with the best opportunity to match into a spine fellowship program.

References

Horst PK, Choo K, Bharucha N, Vail TP. Graduates of Orthopaedic Residency Training Are Increasingly Subspecialized: A Review of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II Database. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015;97(10):869-875. doi:10.2106/JBJS.N.00995

Grabowski G, Walker JW. Orthopaedic fellowship selection criteria: a survey of fellowship directors. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95(20):e154. doi:10.2106/JBJS.L.00954

Morrell NT, Mercer DM, Moneim MS. Trends in the orthopedic job market and the importance of fellowship subspecialty training. Orthopedics. 2012;35(4):e555-e560. doi:10.3928/01477447-20120327-13

DeFroda SF, Shah KN, Safdar O, et al. Trends in research productivity of residents applying for orthopedic sports medicine fellowship. Phys Sportsmed. 2018;46(1):61-65. doi:10.1080/00913847.2018.1411170

Bernatz, James T. MDa, Johnson, Kristina P. MPA, ATCa, Stokman, James J. MDa, et al. Factors Considered in Ranking Spine Surgery Fellowship Applicants, SPINE: July 1, 2021 - Volume 46 - Issue 13 - p 882-885 doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003938

Krueger CA, Hoffman JD, Balazs GC, et al. Protected Resident Research Time Does Not Increase the Quantity or Quality of Residency Program Research Publications: A Comparison of 3 Orthopaedic Residencies. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(2):264-270 doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.08.008.

Williams BR, Agel JA, Van Heest AE. Protected Time for Research During Orthopaedic Residency Correlates with an Increased Number of Resident Publications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017;99(13):e73 doi: 10.2106/jbjs.16.00983

Osborn PM, Ames SE, Turner NS, et al. An Analysis of Research Quality and Productivity at Six Academic Orthopaedic Residencies. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(6):1635-1642 doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.04.022.

Kurian EB, Desai VS, Turner NS, et al. Is Grit the New Fit?-Assessing Non-Cognitive Variables in Orthopaedic Surgery Trainees. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(4):924-930 doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.01.010.

Johnson JP, Savage K, Gil JA, et al. Increased Academic Productivity of Orthopaedic Surgery Residents Following 2011 Duty Hour Reform. J Surg Educ. 2018;75(4):884-887 doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.12.001.

Levy DM, Luchetti TJ, Levine BR. Have Residents Produced More Research Since the Inception of the 80-Hour Workweek? Iowa Orthop J. 2017;37:205-209

Nies MS, Bollinger AJ, Cassidy C, et al. Factors used by program directors to select hand surgery fellows. J Hand Surg Am. 2014;39(11):2285-2288.e2285 doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.07.012.

Baweja R, Kraeutler MJ, Mulcahey MK, et al. Determining the Most Important Factors Involved in Ranking Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Applicants. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(11):2325967117736726 doi: 10.1177/2325967117736726.

DeFroda SF, Shah KN, Safdar O, et al. Trends in Research Productivity of Residents Applying for Orthopedic Sport Medicine Fellowship. Phys Sports Med. 2018;46(1)61-65. doi: 10.1080/00913847.2018.1411170

Published

2024-04-01

How to Cite

Powlan, F., Childs, B., Craft, M., Fares, A., & Kang, D. (2024). The Publication Trends of Orthopaedic Surgery Residents Accepted into Spine Fellowship Programs: Publication Trends of Spine Fellows. Journal of Orthopaedic Business, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v4i2.55