Potential Patient Bias by Insurance Coverage on CG-CAHPS Surveys: Impact on Physician Reimbursement

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v2i3.18

Keywords:

Business, Insurance, Patient Bias, Reimbursement

Abstract

Objectives: Investigate the relationship between payor type and patient experience scores.

Design: Cross-sectional retrospective study.

Setting: Academic orthopaedic outpatient clinic.

Patients: All patients seen in our clinic were given a Press Ganey survey. 2,934 surveys were collected between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2020.

Intervention: Press Ganey patient satisfaction survey overall satisfaction with physician.

Main outcome measurement: Physician overall rating by patients stratified according to payor type.

Results and conclusions: Medicare patients reported the highest satisfaction scores (91.98 ± 0.06), followed by Worker’s Compensation (90.49 ± 0.12), other government coverage (89.91 ± 0.45), commercial insurance (89.36 ± 0.12), Medicaid (88.74 ± 0.30), and self-pay/uncompensated (88.26 ± 0.48). ANOVA analysis resulted in an F value of 270.2205 (p < 0.001). Tukey-Kramer demonstrated statistically significant difference between the means of all payor groups except Medicaid vs. self-pay/uncompensated.

Our data indicates that patient experience scores are influenced by payor type. These biases may negatively impact physician reimbursement, even in the setting of high-quality care. Thus, orthopedic physicians should be mindful of payor type bias when selecting MIPS quality reporting metrics, and policymakers should consider adjusting reimbursement models according to payor-mix.

Level of Evidence: Level III

Keywords: Business, Insurance, Patient Bias, Reimbursement

(J Ortho Business 2022; Volume 2, Issue 3:pages 1-4)

References

Mullins, A., Medicare Payment Reform: Making Sense of MACRA. Fam Pract Manag, 2016. 23(2): p. 12-5.

Hirsch, J.A., et al., MACRA 2.0: are you ready for MIPS? J Neurointerv Surg, 2017. 9(7): p. 714-716.

Medicare Program; Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) and Alternative Payment Model (APM) Incentive Under the Physician Fee Schedule, and Criteria for Physician-Focused Payment Models. Final rule with comment period. Fed Regist. 2016;81(214):77008-77831.

Social Security Administration. Payment for Physicians’ Services. https://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title18/1848.htm#ft390. Accessed August 14, 2020.

Japsen B., More Doctor Pay Tied To Patient Satisfaction And Outcomes. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucejapsen/2018/06/18/more-doctor-pay-tied-to-patient-satisfaction-and-outcomes/#6cfac48f504a. Published 2018. Accessed May 14, 2020.

Batbaatar, E., et al., Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Perspect Public Health, 2017. 137(2): p. 89-101.

Johnson, B.C., et al., Association Between Nonmodifiable Demographic Factors and Patient Satisfaction Scores in Spine Surgery Clinics. Orthopedics, 2019. 42(3): p. 143-148.

Tisano, B.K., et al., Depression and Non-modifiable Patient Factors Associated with Patient Satisfaction in an Academic Orthopaedic Outpatient Clinic: Is it More Than a Provider Issue? Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2019. 477(12): p. 2653-2661.

Rane, A.A., A.R. Tyser, and N.H. Kazmers, Evaluating the Impact of Wait Time on Orthopaedic Outpatient Satisfaction Using the Press Ganey Survey. JB JS Open Access, 2019. 4(4): p. e0014.

Compton, J., N. Glass, and T. Fowler, The Effect of Workers' Compensation Status on the Patient Experience. JB JS Open Access, 2019. 4(2): p. e0003.

Pines, J.M., et al., Measurement Under the Microscope: High Variability and Limited Construct Validity in Emergency Department Patient-Experience Scores. Ann Emerg Med, 2018. 71(5): p. 545-554.e6.

Huynh, H.P., et al., Who is satisfied with general surgery clinic visits? J Surg Res, 2014. 192(2): p. 339-47.

Abtahi, A.M., et al., Association Between Orthopaedic Outpatient Satisfaction and Non-Modifiable Patient Factors. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2015. 97(13): p. 1041-8.

Hayward D, d.R.W., de Riese C., Potential Bias of Patient Payor Category on CG-CAHPS Scores and its Impact on Physician Reimbursement. 2021: Journal of Urology Practice.

Bui S., d.R.W., de Riese C., Payer Class Bias in Patient Satisfaction Surveys. J Med Pract Manag.

Liu, S.S., et al., Addressing Medicaid Expansion from the Perspective of Patient Experience in Hospitals. Patient, 2016. 9(5): p. 445-55.

Xiang, X., W.Y. Xu, and R.E. Foraker, Is higher patient satisfaction associated with better stroke outcomes? Am J Manag Care, 2017. 23(10): p. e316-e322.

Lobo Prabhu, K., et al., Is quality important to our patients? The relationship between surgical outcomes and patient satisfaction. BMJ Qual Saf, 2018. 27(1): p. 48-52.

Tyser, A.R., et al., Evidence of non-response bias in the Press-Ganey patient satisfaction survey. BMC Health Serv Res, 2016. 16(a): p. 350.

Published

2022-07-01

How to Cite

Hayward, D., Hawkes, C., Perry, C., de Riese, W., & Zumwalt, M. (2022). Potential Patient Bias by Insurance Coverage on CG-CAHPS Surveys: Impact on Physician Reimbursement. Journal of Orthopaedic Business, 2(3), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.55576/job.v2i3.18